I’ll let Henry describe this one by himself: “It was in Oxford on the river at sunset, and basically the sky and the river are identical, and so it can be viewed any way up, one way the water seems to be lit up than the sky and the other way, it looks like the picture as it was actually taken. Thats about it.”
the photo is great. I love it….. still the only thing that gives it all away is that the lights from those buildings are not reflected in the water ;)
pretty cool…gud pic
good picture, but why did you rotate it?!?
is it just me, or is that picture upsidedown?
Good Photoshop effort. Unfortunately you can see that there are 2 separate photos. If you brighten it up a bit you can see it way too well.
The reflection of the lights gave it away, same with the “missing” trees.
It doesn’t look like a river or sky to me. It looks like snow. That’s probably why the lights and trees aren’t reflected.
um………..what? why aren’t the lights reflected in the water? and the trees are different……..
Yep. The thing that makes you wonder is, which way is actually right side up?
i dont know about you,
but to me,
its obviously photoshopped.
evidence:
uno; missing/added trees
dos; lit up house in reflection, but not in real
and tres; fail!
u should make a way too flip the pic over
scary….
The moon is also in a different location, along with the missing trees and lights. The more I look the more lame some of these pics seem. Illusions are cool, treating people like idiots isn’t.
It is upside down lol, but it looks really cool.
The differences in both halves are due to the 3D geometry of the landscape as seen from the photographer’s viewpoint.
The picture IS, obviously, upside down but the distance of the trees and houses from the shore-line plus the camera’s position above the horizontal explains all the “errors” non-photographers identify in the picture.
I love it
i get the picture its rotated an the up is the water reflection